Services

Four lines of work. Each starts with a conversation about what is currently breaking, not a proposal document.

Whichever line it is, an engagement runs the same way: scope, then build, then handover.

Typical timeline

Scoped against the work, not a fixed package.

Indicative, not an offer or a quote. What binds either of us is the written agreement we both sign.

Web application development

Web applications, APIs, internal tools and the integrations between them — greenfield builds, and stalled projects picked up.

Best fit when

A process needs a system of its own, or the tools you already run need to talk to each other.

What you get

  • A working application, deployed, with the repository in your account
  • Authentication, roles and permission boundaries that survive a real org chart
  • A written architecture note explaining why it is built the way it is
  • Deployment and environment setup you can run without us
Web application development in detail

Mobile app development

iOS and Android applications, from one codebase where that serves the product and natively where it does not.

Best fit when

The thing has to work on a customer's phone, including on a poor connection.

What you get

  • Applications submitted to the App Store and Play Store under your developer accounts
  • Offline behaviour and sync decided deliberately rather than discovered in the field
  • Push notification and deep-link setup
  • A release process you can run for the next version
Mobile app development in detail

AI and automation

Agents, document processing and workflow automation built into systems that already run.

Best fit when

Repetitive documents or decisions could be automated, and being wrong about one of them is expensive.

What you get

  • Automation running against your real workflow, not a demonstration
  • Human review points at every step where being wrong is expensive
  • Logging that shows what was decided and why
  • A cost model, so running it is a known number rather than a surprise
AI and automation in detail

Technology advisory

Architecture review, build-versus-buy, stack and vendor decisions, and roadmaps for teams without an in-house technical lead.

Best fit when

A technical direction has to be settled before anyone commits a budget to building it.

What you get

  • A written assessment of the current system, including what is fine and should be left alone
  • Options with costs and trade-offs, and a recommendation rather than a menu
  • A sequenced roadmap with what to do first and what can wait
  • Vendor and stack recommendations, with the reasoning attached
Technology advisory in detail

Who this is for

Businesses whose operations have outgrown spreadsheets

  • Education and study-abroad consultancies
  • Medical tourism operators
  • Recruitment and labour-mobility agencies
  • Visa and immigration consultancies
  • Freight, logistics and trade facilitation
  • Diaspora services — property, legal, remittance-adjacent

Tell us what is still held together by spreadsheets and email

Describe the process, and we will tell you whether we are the right studio for it — and where we would start if we are.

Thirty minutes, or email hello@nyansastudio.com